动态 » 讲座与会议

清华大学人文与社会系列讲座:安东尼奥·奈格里教授

清华大学人文与社会系列讲座:安东尼奥·奈格里教授

清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所 讲座海报

清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所
清华大学人文与社会系列讲座:安东尼奥·奈格里教授(Antonio Negri) 系列讲演,11月27日-11月29日

清华大学人文与社会系列讲座

清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所主办


安东尼奥·奈格里教授

Antonio Negri

清华大学系列讲演

 

第一讲:作为后工业化工厂的都市

11月27日 19:00 清华大学公共管理学院报告厅

点评人: 潘毅 教授 (香港理工大学)

第二讲:共同性与民主

11月29日 15:00清华大学公共管理学院报告厅

点评人: 崔之元 教授 (清华大学)

第三讲:福柯之后,如何阅读马克思?(圆桌讨论)

12月1日

 

【主持】汪晖 教授 (清华大学)

【语种】意大利文(现场翻译)

【主办单位】清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所

【演讲人简介】 

Antonio Negri

安东尼奥·奈格里(Antonio Negri, 1933 - ) , 意大利激进马克思主义哲学家,也是当代世界最重要的左翼思想家和活动家之一。早年在帕多瓦大学受教育, 毕业后在大学任教, 36岁任正教授。奈格里1956年加入意大利工人社会主义党, 20世纪60年代转向马克思主义, 是意大利工人自治运动的领导者和思想领袖。1978年到1997年间,奈格里先后在巴黎第八大学和哲学国际学院任教, 与德勒兹、福柯和德里达等人共事。

奈格里试图把马克思主义与法国后结构主义传统及斯宾诺莎哲学相结合。他与Michael Hardt合作撰写的《帝国》(Empire, 2000)一书描述了全球资本主义条件下民族国家主权形式的衰落和一种新的全球帝国的出现,这本书在全球范围内引发了巨大的争论,齐泽克称这本书旨在为21世纪重写《共产党宣言》。在《帝国》之后,奈格里又与哈特合作出版了三部曲的后两部《诸众》(Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire,2004)和《大同世界》 (Commonwealth, 2011)。奈格里其他主要著作有: The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty - first Century (1989) ,Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse ( 1991 ) ,The Savage Anomaly: the Power of Spinozaps Metaphysics and Politics ( 2000 ) ,Time for Revolution (2005) 等。

奈格里简介

ANTONIO NEGRI - BIOGRAPHY

来自: http://www.egs.edu/faculty/antonio-negri/biography/

Antonio Negri, Ph.D., is an Italian Marxist sociologist, scholar, revolutionary philosopher and teacher. Antonio Negri was born August 1, 1933 in Padua, Italy. He is most well known for his groundbreaking work Empire, which was wrote with Michael Hardt. Antonio Negri is influenced in great part by Karl Marx andBenedict Baruch Spinoza.. Antonio Negri was a founder of the group, Potere Operaio (Worker Power), in 1969 and was an active member in the groupAutonomia Operaia.

Antonio Negri grew up in Padua, Italy becoming a militant in the 1950s. He joined the Roman Catholic Activist youth group Gioventú Italiana di Azione Cattolica (GIAC). From 1956 to 1963 Antonio Negri became a member of the Italian Socialist Party. During this period Antonio Negri was increasingly active within Marxist movements of the time. In the early 60’s Antonio joined the editorial board of the Marxist Italian journal, Quaderni Rossi. As a young man, Antonio began his academic career at the University of Padua where he was appointed to a full professor in dottrina dello Stato (State Theory). This Italian academic discipline focuses on juridical and constitutional theory. In 1969 Antonio Negri, Oreste Scalzone and Franco Piperno founded the group Potere Operaio (Workers' Power) and the Operaismo (workerist) Communist movement. Potere Operaio disbanded in 1973 and gave rise to the Autonomia Operaia Organizzata (Organised Workers' Autonomy) movement.

Antonio Negri was arrested in 1979 due to his relation with the Autonomy Movement. Aldo Moro, the former Italian prime minister and Christian Democratic leader was kidnapped in Rome on March 16, 1978 by the Red Brigades. While he was being held a phone call was placed threatining Aldo Moro’s wife that her husband would soon be dead, following the call, nine days later he was shot in the head and dumped in a city side street. Negri was accused of being the mastermind of the kidnapping and murder and accused of plotting to overturn the government. A year later Antonio Negri was exonerated from the murder charges, but was still imprisoned for other related charges.

Felix Guattari and Gilles Deleuze both protested Negri’s imprisoment and Italy’s anti-terrorism laws. Michel Foucault famously said, “Isn’t he in jail simply for being an intellectual?" While in prison in 1983, only four years after his arrest while he was still awaiting trial, Negri was elected to the Italian legislature with the Radical Party. He was then temporarily released and escaped to France for 14 years. He wrote and taught during his time in France and was protected under the “Mitterand doctrine". While in France Antonio Negri taught philosophy courses at the Université de Paris VIII (Saint Denis) and the Collège International de Philosophie, which was founded by Jacques Derrida.

During his stay in France, Antonio Negri was active amongst intellectuals. Antonio founded the journal Futur Antérieur with Jean-Marie Vincent and Denis Berger in 1990. In 1998 the journal stopped publication, but was renamed and rebirthed as Multitudes in 2000 with Antonio Negri was made a member of the international editorial board. In 1997, after a plea-bargain that reduced his prison time from 30 to 13 years, he returned to Italy to serve the end of his sentence. Many of his most influential books were published while he was behind bars. He now lives between Venice and Paris with his partner, the French philosopher Judith Revel.

Antonio Negri studies Marxism, anti-capitalism, postmodernism, noeliberalism, the commons, the multitude and democratic globalization. Antonio Negri is most well known for his book written with Michael Hardt Empire (2000). Empire deals with the globalization of information and markets and the effect they have had on politics. Hardt & Negri argue that the decline in nation-state sovereignty is directly linked to the increasingly globalized world. What happens with the decline of the nation-state is the rise of a new form of sovereignty under supranational organization with an increasingly unified logic of ruling. This new global matrix of sovereignty is called empire. The book examines how labor functions within such systems analyzing concepts such as living labor.

In Empire, Hardt and Negri offered the analysis of the functioning of current global power structures due to the transformation of imperialism and American dominance which happened after the Vietnam war. In this new state of affairs, the sovereignty of the nation state has declined and a new form of sovereignty was created, which they name the 'empire'. Following the poststructuralist model set by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, the empire is seen as being characterized by flexible, mobile boundaries and hybrid identities, as a decentered global network and a dynamic pattern of breaks and flows. In this network of coordinated collaboration, no nation state is really sovereign anymore and even the most powerful nation is not able to control the global order.

Therefore, the main question Hardt and Negri were interested in was to try to define the new authority that guarantees the long-term survival of capital after the demise of the nation state which functioned as its main guarantee of sustainability. According to them, this authority is the empire, with no center or the binary opposition of the outside and inside. Further on, Hardt and Negri formulate the most relevant task today to be the mapping of the geography of global power divisions where power is seen as transcendental and not transcendent. Only through this we might reach some of the possible answers to the question, 'what forms of contestation of power are possible today?' As Hardt and Negri remind us, the most dangerous thing would be to fight the enemy that no longer exists.

Upon completing Empire, Hardt and Negri felt the need to further elaborate on the subject or form of an alternative for which they believed remained at a poetic level in their previous analysis. Therefore, in Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire they examine the possibilities of cooperative resistance to the new global order. Hardt and Negri decided to work upon this question by rethinking the concept of the working class which they refuse to see as a homogeneous group. They formulate the need for a political party that will have a form of a horizontal network structure without a centralized point of decision or leadership. For this, they have found the inspiration in several organizations created after the 1960s in order to defend the rights of marginalized groups such as the black power, civil rights movement, homosexual and queer organizations. Established in such a way with no centralized power, these organizations raised the question of the possibilities of multiplicity to act together.

According to Hardt and Negri, the power of resistance is much stronger than what we might think and if held the right way, any tool can become one's weapon of revolution. Instead of trying to answer the question of what is to be done, they propose answering the question of what are people already doing, as a way to create a particular catalog of ideas for revolutionary practices. According to them, the main question about what democracy is today and what it could be in a global world will remain unanswered and in the realm of fantasy unless there is a subject that can fill it. Therefore, the new subject of democracy is exactly this entity they named 'multitude', and the democracy of the future can be saved only if there is a freedom to determine what are we to become.

In their third part of the trilogy entitled Commonwealth, Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri offer a framework in which to restore the meaning of the many corrupted concepts of political vocabulary. They will further elaborate their previous suggestions for the social change that can be obtained by using the current forms of class oppression by joining it with the necessity to rethink the common in communism in order for this change to actually happen.

请您支持独立网站发展,转载请注明文章链接:
  • 文章地址: http://wen.org.cn/modules/news/view.article.php?c5/387
  • 跟踪地址: http://wen.org.cn/modules/news/trackback.php?387

汪晖教授《去政治化的政治》一书韩文版出版 南京博物院《执笔的流变·历代执笔图像汇展》
相关文章
汪晖:改制与中国工人阶级的历史命运
米西拉:中国的新左派 (缩减版)
汪晖:中央民族大学讲座与讨论纪要(如何诠释中国及其现代)
汪晖:“去政治化的政治”与大众传媒的公共性(访谈)
汪晖:贾樟柯的世界与中国的大转变
毛泽东与后奥运时代的文化选择:《毛泽东》开幕座谈纪要
汪晖:秩序还是失序?--阿明与他对全球化的看法
汪晖:为未来而辩论
丁萌:汪晖华师大演讲笔记--如何诠释中国及其现代性
汪晖:在对话中追寻
汪晖:东方主义、民族区域自治与尊严政治--关于“西藏问题”的一点思考
汪晖:高等研究与人文社会科学
汪晖:《改制与中国工人阶级的历史命运》一文附记
汪晖:让中国说话--安吉拉·帕斯古齐著《说话的中国》(TALKIN' CHINA)序言
汪晖:文化与政治的变奏--“一战”与1910年代的“思想战”
吴铭:社会保护运动与平等政治的前景
汪晖:“90年代”的终结(《新京报》访谈)
汪晖:自主与开放的辩证法——关于60年来的中国经验 (21世纪经济报道访谈)
杜赞奇:中国漫长的二十世纪的历史和全球化
汪晖:琉球与区域秩序的两次巨变
柄谷行人、汪晖:从马克思主义的视角思考全球主义--东亚共同体的可能性
汪晖:帝国的冲突,或帝国主义时代的冲突?--《帝国的话语政治》座谈会上的发言
佩里·安德森:霸权之后? ——当代世界的权力结构
汪晖:自主与开放的辩证法--中国崛起的经验及其面临的挑战
汪晖:中国:跨体系的社会
钟彪:“学风”问题还是文字狱?--评《汪晖<反抗绝望--鲁迅及其文学世界>的学风问题》
魏行:媒体暴力与学术独立--关于一起媒体公共事件的备忘录
舒炜:“王彬彬式搅拌”对学术的危害
李陀:回应林毓生的公开信
李陀:致林毓生先生的一封信(完整版)
汪晖:理论、实践与历史诠释――答纽约大学研究生问
贺桂梅:作为方法与政治的整体观 ——解读汪晖的“中国问题”论
沈卫荣:也谈东方主义和“西藏问题”
就“汪晖事件”给清华大学校长的签名信
李陀:九十年代的分歧到底在哪里?
白露:时代周报专访美国莱斯大学历史系教授白露
何春蕤:我为什么参与维护汪晖权益的联署
汪晖:我从不拒绝真正的学术批判!
别求新声—汪晖的学术世界与当代中国思想之进路学术座谈会
韩咏红:《联合早报》汪晖专访--不回应是坦荡面对学术批判
顾彬先生的逻辑与《羊城晚报》的证据--《羊城晚报》公布的所谓"汪袭网"之证据点评
陈青:从法律角度看汪晖事件
“别求新声——汪晖的学术世界与当代中国思想之进路” 学术座谈会
汪晖:声之善恶:什么是启蒙?--重读鲁迅的《破恶声论》
汪晖:亚洲想象的政治
汪晖:“代表性的断裂”:反思未来民主的进程
汪晖:关于“早期现代性”及其他
汪晖:《世界历史中的中国:文革、琉球、西藏》序言
萨米尔·阿明:埃及的运动(汪晖、刘健芝采访)
柄谷行人:普遍与特殊——两个交叉的观点
汪晖:中国道路的独特性与普遍性
汪晖:中国“新自由主义”的历史根源--再论当代中国大陆的思想状况与现代性问题
汪晖:阿Q生命中的六个瞬间--纪念作为开端的辛亥革命
汪晖:中国道路的独特性与普遍性
黄怒波:卓奥友营地读汪晖“去政治化的政治”
汪晖:留作绝唱的纪念--闻韶著《我守着最小的世界》 序言
汪晖:再问“什么的平等”?(上)
戴锦华、汪晖谈《南京!南京!》——写在《金陵十三钗》公映前
汪晖:革命、妥协与连续性的创制(上)
汪晖:齐物平等与跨体系社会--再问“什么的平等”(全文)
加布里尔与汪晖:金融危机时代的民主和正义
汪晖:革命、妥协与连续性的创制(全文)
汪晖:凤凰如何涅槃?--关于徐冰的《凤凰》
汪晖:上升期的矛盾、体系性危机与变革方向——汪晖教授访谈
季剑青:民族主义能否成为我们的思想资源?--读汪晖《东西之间的"西藏问题"(外二篇)》
汪晖、戈泽帕特:“如今没人再提社会民主”
汪晖:两种"新穷人"及其未来
汪晖:"我有自己的名字"--吕途著《中国新工人-迷失与崛起》序言
克鲁格、汪晖:反媒体撕开了媒体那厚重的窗帘(对话)
汪晖:面向新世界图景的文化自觉
汪晖:20世纪充满悲剧,也留下遗产
汪晖:墓园·颠倒
汪晖:世界政治制度中“代表性”的缺失(访谈)
谭桂林:评汪晖近期的鲁迅思想研究
哈特、奈格里:《大众》序言:共同的生活
严海蓉、林春、何高潮、汪晖等:社会主义实践的现代性
汪晖:发言节选(修订稿)--“现代性”与“自主性”—“中国现代美术之路”课题成果发布暨学术研讨会录要(节选三)
汪晖:"后政党政治"与代表性危机
汪晖:重影--扬州杂忆
米诺罗: 非欧洲的思想家和哲学家可能更具有相关性(译文)
汪晖:鲁迅文学的诞生--读《<呐喊>自序》
朱金春、王丽娜:从“多元一体格局”到“跨体系社会” ——民族研究的区域视角与超民族视野
汪晖、贝淡宁:城市何以安顿我们?
汪晖:中国、新的平等观与世界--Gabriele Battaglia对话汪晖
现代自觉与文化重构--《弥散与生成》国际研讨会发言辑要(上)
高毅哲:汪晖:思想无疆
汪晖:公理、时势与越界的知识--在帕西欧利奖(2013 Luca Pacioli Prize)颁奖仪式上的演讲
汪晖:二十世纪中国历史视野下的抗美援朝战争
汪晖对话马哈茂德·马姆达尼
王维佳:汪晖为什么那么重要
季剑青:令人失望的“学术批评” ——评杨奎松《以论带史的尴尬》
汪晖:从当代变迁中重新思考改革--关于政党国家化与市场决定作用的一点思考
汪晖:去政治化的政治、霸权的多重构成与六十年代的消逝
南水:"党史专家"的满腔质疑却变成对方的脚注--关于杨奎松《也谈"去政治化"问题 》的几点看法
高默波:《高家村》中文版自序
陆云:从学术攻击到"暴力学术"--杨奎松两批汪晖的案例分析
中国应该找到自己的方式--汪晖对话前西德总理施密特
汪晖:代表性断裂与"后政党政治"
黄宗智:《中国政治体系正当性基础的来源与走向:中西方学者对话(七)》导言
多媒体:本尼迪克特·安德森清华大学人文与社会科学高等研究所系列讲演第二讲
汪晖、罗岗、鲁明军:跨界对谈:历史、革命与当代青年的思想构成
汪晖:新批判精神--与《新左翼评论》佩里·安德森对谈
汪晖:两岸历史中的失踪者--《台共党人的悲歌》与台湾的历史记忆
大卫·哈维:哈特与奈格里《大同世界》(commonwealth)
哈特与奈格里:对大卫·哈维的回应:关于《大同世界》
汪晖:大陆-海洋与亚洲的区域化——清华大学人文学院汪晖教授访谈(吴铭)
汪晖:两种新穷人及其未来--阶级政治的衰落、再形成与新穷人的尊严政治
汪晖:当代中国历史巨变中的台湾问题
邱士杰:21世纪的20世纪台湾社会主义运动与民族再统一──汪晖老师《当代中国历史巨变中的台湾问题》读后
汪晖:金沙江之子——追忆萧亮中
黄棘:"20世纪苏联中国的社会主义:理论与实践"国际学术研讨会综述
汪晖:两洋之间的文明--2015年6月29日喀什大学演讲
汪晖:二十世纪中国历史视野下的抗美援朝战争
林峻煒:內在視野與現代性批判:試探汪暉之中國思想論
文佳筠:五年来中美两国应对气候变化的对比(2010-2015)
汪晖:《世界工厂》作为一种社会研究和实践的剧场
汪晖:"毛主义运动"的幽灵
汪晖:二十世纪中国历史视野下的抗美援朝战争
汪晖:代表性断裂与"后政党政治"
王兵、汪晖:《入选卡塞尔文献展的中国电影》对谈全记录
API: 工具箱 焦点 短消息 Email PDF 书签
© 人文与社会



Xoops 苏ICP备10024138 | © 06-12 人文与社会