<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="ARTICLE @ XOOPS powered by FeedCreator" -->
<rss version="0.91">
    <channel>
        <title>人文与社会 :: 文章</title>
        <description><![CDATA[文章XML]]></description>
        <link>http://wen.org.cn/modules/article/view.article.php/3449/c10</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 22:28:54 +1600</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>ARTICLE @ XOOPS powered by FeedCreator</generator>
        
        <language>zh-CN</language>
        <managingEditor>admin at wen dot org dot cn</managingEditor>
        <webMaster>admin at wen dot org dot cn</webMaster>
        <category>文章</category>
        <item>
            <title>梁赞采夫：俄罗斯移民政策的新方案：完善的必经之路</title>
            <link>http://wen.org.cn/modules/article/view.article.php/3449/c10</link>
            <description><![CDATA[学科: 政治<br />来源: (中国世界史研究网; 英文稿来自uc davis移民对话网)<br />关键词: 梁赞采夫，朱磊，俄罗斯，人口政策，移民政策<br />摘要: 本文是俄罗斯科学院通讯院士，经济学博士、教授、俄罗斯科学院社会政治研究所社会人口和经济社会学中心负责人谢尔盖·瓦西里耶维奇·梁赞采夫（Sergei V. Ryazantsev）在全俄科学实践会议"二十一世纪前二十五年俄罗斯各地区的人口现状与未来"上的报告。附更详英译<p>最近20年，俄罗斯的移民政策遭到了公民社会各个阶层的批评。这完全是可以理解的。移民政策低效率的重要原因之一是国家缺乏足够的时间和需要去调整移民方案。俄罗斯有关调整移民过程的最新方案是2003年通过的。但是，无论是在意识形态方面，还是在思想内容方面，该方案均已明显不符合时代的要求了。几年前，俄罗斯联邦移民局已开始起草一项新的国家移民政策方案。新版本的方案能否适应时代要求？它是否考虑到了旧方案的错误和今天的现实呢？</p><p><br /> 必须承认，新方案中包含了很多"突破"的想法，这将有助于俄罗斯在维护国家利益方面调整移民政策。特别是移民第一次不只被视为国家的威胁，同时也被视为国家发展的资源。此外，这一方案中不仅包括了运用行政方法调整移民政策，而且还包括了当前形势下无疑更为有效的一些经济手段。较为重要的还包括，新方案中研究了促进俄罗斯人口内部流动的问题。<br /><br /> 很显然，移民政策在逻辑上应该是"源于"国家人口政策（2007年10月的总统令批准2025年前俄罗斯联邦人口政策方案）。尤其是，常住移民和临时国外劳动移民的数量必须是与俄罗斯社会经济和人口发展指数"紧密相连"的。新方案中提出了一些论据，赞成在不考虑国家内部储备的情况下，在提高出生率和降低死亡率方面，在利用"储备"群体（失业者，青年，退休人员，残疾人士）的劳动潜能以及减少移民损失等方面扩大移民数量。应当指出，俄罗斯总人口中有630多万失业者，每年有250万合法的国外劳动移民，非法务工的国外劳动移民数量估计是300万至500万。同时，应该邀请和接收的移民数量到底应该是多少，这是国家需要面对的一个原则性问题。<br /><br /> 许多发达国家早已尝试机械性地通过移民，首先是劳动移民来增加人口。出现了一个术语--"替代移民"，它的意思是移民人口抵消了总人口数量或特定年龄群体的人口数量下降。然而，经验表明，大规模的替代移民也带来了很多文化、社会问题，甚至政治问题。目前，经济发达国家的移民政策，对于非熟练劳动力群体来说变得更加严厉，它优先考虑具有高学历、高素质的移民。此外，经济发达国家的政府开始越来越多地关注旨在刺激人口出生率和帮助有孩子的家庭的人口政策。<br /><br /> 我们认为，俄罗斯移民政策的目的是不明确的。"稳定和增加常住人口数量"不能是国家移民政策的目标，这应该是人口政策的目标。俄罗斯移民政策的目的应该用另一种表达方式，即"减少移民外流，使来俄永久居留、工作和学习的移民保持在必需的指标上"。我们需要指出，遗憾的是，在这一方案中几乎没有提到俄罗斯移民外流的问题。只是在谈到回归侨民时"顺便"提了一下。诚然，吸引俄罗斯的同胞和侨民回国很重要，但我们也不能对当今俄罗斯的移民外流问题无动于衷。<br /><br /> 文件中规范外籍劳动移民的过程没有明确的依据。要知道劳动移民是俄罗斯最大的移民流之一，这一问题现在极为重要。目前，国家所做的更多是登记外国劳工数量，而不是考虑如何管理它们。俄罗斯的外国劳工配额制度遭到了严厉批评。没有明确的评价机制，缺乏确定外籍劳工实际需要数量的方法，不存在劳动力资源的平衡。<br /><br /> 上面提到的文件中还缺乏对来俄教育移民的足够关注。该文件只是重点谈到了从独联体国家吸引教育移民。当然，这对俄罗斯来说是一个重要的地区，但国家必须在全球留学市场占据更加积极的地位，这就要求我们不仅应该吸引来自独联体国家的学生，也要吸引来自其他国家的留学生。<br /><br /> 在新方案中没有提到吸引不同国家（独联体，欧洲，北美，日本，中国）商业移民的渠道，他们准备在俄罗斯不仅仅是进行经济投资。<br /><br /> 文件中几乎没有提到俄罗斯移民外流的问题，更没有提出减少国家移民外流的方法。在界定外流移民成分这一没有多大绝对意义的事情背后，隐藏着与移民流素质结构相关的重要问题。俄罗斯外流移民的年龄结构中，有劳动能力和低于劳动年龄的人群比例提高了，而退休人员的比重则相应减少了。<br /><br /> 在国家移民政策的方案中应当体现出完善和发展的途径，而现在在俄罗斯缺乏相应的这一考虑。首先，应当指出，关于移民的信息是零散的。<br /><br /> 我们认为，上述建议应当在制定国家移民政策方案时被考虑，因为这对国家发展具有原则性的意义。而通过的文件应当为国家未来数年移民过程的发展提供依据。</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p align="right">（朱磊翻译 黄立茀供稿）</p><p>Sergei V. Ryazantsev, professor, Doctor of Economy, Head of Center Social&nbsp;Demography and Economic Sociology in Institute Socio-Politic Research of&nbsp;Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russian Federation)</p><p><strong>The Modern Migration Policy of Russia: Problems and Necessary&nbsp;Directions of Perfection</strong></p><p>The Russian Federation has become one of the leading immigration receiving&nbsp;countries based on absolute number of immigrants. It is possible to identify two&nbsp;principal causes that determine immigration to Russia. The first is internal: the&nbsp;Russian economy has developed in a relatively successful way, demands for&nbsp;expanding the labour force have increased and relatives of Russians, who formerly&nbsp;lived in the USSR are now living in CIS countries. The external cause of&nbsp;immigration to Russia lies in the fact that Russia has potent demographic resources&nbsp;nearby. China, India and the Central Asian states represent this potential. &nbsp;At&nbsp;present these countries are home to nearly half of the world's population. Among&nbsp;numerous consequences of large-scale immigration to Russia is the formation and&nbsp;increase in the numbers of ethnic communities that occupy "niches" in some&nbsp;branches of the economy where they enjoy solid positions in business. The main&nbsp;migrant flow to Russia is channelled from the CIS countries. From 1993 to 2009 Russia received &nbsp;7.1 million persons from these former USSR countries. For the&nbsp;most part (approximately 60%) the migrants were ethnic Russians.</p><p>Migration was and remains the important component of demographic and&nbsp;economic development of Russia and some regions. The data of the Russian&nbsp;statistical committee says that in 2009 international migration &nbsp;on &nbsp;97%&nbsp;compensated natural decline in population of the country. At the regional level a&nbsp;situation &nbsp;with the &nbsp;migration &nbsp;role &nbsp;is &nbsp;differed. &nbsp;The &nbsp;first &nbsp;zone &nbsp;is &nbsp;characterized &nbsp;by&nbsp;migratory outflow of the population and covers thirty eight regions. And in thirty&nbsp;regions migratory outflow of the population coincides with the general reduction of&nbsp;a population. The second zone includes forty six territories of Russia in which&nbsp;inflow of migrants is marked, however only in sixteen of them migration or&nbsp;completely compensates a natural decrease or supplements a population natural&nbsp;increase.</p><p>At present time, the Russian Federation is confronted with the negative&nbsp;demographic situation which involves the population decline, the decrease of the&nbsp;part of able-bodied citizens, and the ageing population. According the pessimistic 2predictive estimate of the Conception of demographic development, Russian&nbsp;population decline &nbsp;on 18-20 million people. &nbsp;In this situation &nbsp;the immigration&nbsp;policy of Russia directed not on restriction of entrance, and on attraction of&nbsp;necessary categories of immigrants is required to the country.</p><p>In October, 2007 was accepting the new Concept of a Demographic Policy of&nbsp;the Russian Federation till 2025. It has been accepted designates purpose&nbsp;absolutely adequate to demographic situation in Russia - immigrants are necessary&nbsp;for the country. The given point of view was stated repeatedly &nbsp;by the Russian&nbsp;President us well. However, at level of practice of regulation of immigration until&nbsp;recently has developed and there was cardinally opposite situation. The&nbsp;immigration policy was reduced to struggle against illegal migration and limited&nbsp;inflow of any immigrants to the country.</p><p>Change of a migratory policy of Russia it is necessary in following directions.</p><p>1. &nbsp;"Collecting of Russian Compatriots". Russia, unlike other countries of the&nbsp;world, is in unique position. It is surrounded by the states which made earlier the&nbsp;uniform country, and now focus millions the people close in the cultural and&nbsp;mental relation, speaking in Russian. Now more than 17 million Russian people&nbsp;live in CIS and Baltic States. The part of this population forms the migratorypotential for Russian Federation. Migratory potential Russians and Russian ethnic&nbsp;groups is estimated no more than 3-4 million people in medium-term outlook. It&nbsp;gives chance throughout several years to involve Russian and representatives of the&nbsp;Russian people and sharply not to change ethnic structure of the population, and&nbsp;also to spend much smaller means for integration of immigrants in a society and to&nbsp;avoid serious international conflicts.</p><p>The Russian &nbsp;President signed by the in 2006 &nbsp;the &nbsp;decree "On the measures to&nbsp;aiding voluntary return of compatriots living abroad to &nbsp;the Russian Federation".&nbsp;Also a corresponding governmental scheme (the period of 2006-2012) has been&nbsp;carried out for the purpose of stimulating the voluntary resettlement of compatriots&nbsp;in the Russian Federation on the ground of increasing appeal of its subjects; for the&nbsp;purpose of compensating the population decline on the basis of attracting&nbsp;immigrants to have permanent residence in Russia. For March, 1st, 2010 within the&nbsp;limits of the state program to Russia already has moved more &nbsp;than 18 thousand&nbsp;persons and about twenty seven thousand are at various stages of resettlement. The&nbsp;program planned to accept much more migrants. Some experts hasten to declare&nbsp;that the program has failed. The Russian authorities have underestimated scale of&nbsp;the given project. On its realization time and money is required.</p><p>According to the governmental scheme the federal government provide&nbsp;compatriots with: citizenship, public assistance, payment for passage and baggage&nbsp;delivery, extraordinary grant. The local authorities must help compatriots with&nbsp;placing in a job. According to the scheme the whole part of the Russian Federation&nbsp;was divided into three categories ("A", "B", "C") with corresponding size of a&nbsp;moneyed assistance, which is to be given to the compatriots by the government.The regions "A" are supposed to have a national border and population decline in&nbsp;the last three years. The &nbsp;participants &nbsp;of the scheme, &nbsp;who &nbsp;are &nbsp;to &nbsp;remove &nbsp;to &nbsp;these&nbsp;regions, will receive 60.000 rubles (2.000 USD) and 20.000 rubles (670 USD) for&nbsp;each member of the family. Only one member of the family may receive status of&nbsp;participant &nbsp;of the scheme. The regions "B" and "C" are determined by several&nbsp;economic indexes, such as unemployment rate, level of investment, share of region&nbsp;in gross domestic product and number of migrants. The compatriots removing to&nbsp;regions "B" will receive 40.000 rubles (1.340 USD) and 15.000 rubles (500 USD)&nbsp;for each member of the family.</p><p><strong>On first stage the government has selected 12 regions. </strong>They are the Krasnoyarsk&nbsp;Territory, the Primorsky Kray, the Khabarovsk Territory, Province of Amur,&nbsp;Province of Irkutsk, Province of Kaliningrad, Province of Kaluga, Province of&nbsp;Lipetsk, Province of Novosibirsk, Province of Tambov, Province of Tver and&nbsp;Province of Tyumen. The scheme suggests removing about 670 thousand peoplehere.  At the second stage program action will extend at the expense of new territories of Russia. Now regional programs of resettlement of compatriots are confirmed approximately in 20 regions. The geography of action of the program has considerably extended. This external migration can help government to solve several problems, first of all, population decline and losses of the able-bodied population. Russia  will  try  to  compensate  natural  loss  of  the  population  of economically and geopolitically important regions like Far East with  the  help  of governmental scheme.</p><p>The main part of the compatriots is arriving in Province of Kaliningrad. This&nbsp;fact can be explained by particular geographical location, improvements of&nbsp;economy and living standards of the region, the above mentioned process is a&nbsp;matter of great interest to local authorities. They are ready to receive about 300thousand &nbsp;of resettles. &nbsp;The regions of the Far East &nbsp;cause &nbsp;anxiety. &nbsp;There is apopulation decline and &nbsp;sizeable &nbsp;migratory outflow in these regions, &nbsp;butcompatriots, &nbsp;however, don't &nbsp;aspire to migrate here. &nbsp;Only 2.2 &nbsp;percent &nbsp;of&nbsp;compatriots chose these regions.</p><p>The &nbsp;detailed analysis of the mechanism of resettlement displayed essentialmeasures for increase of compatriot's migration flow. First of all, state must help 4settlers with habitation. It may be if state will extend pace of construction, will&nbsp;create on preferential terms state hypothec for resettles and will place at him&nbsp;disposal land and construction materials for building. Secondly, it is necessary to&nbsp;make special programmes for Russian-speaking young people and families with&nbsp;many children, because they are the most favorable migrants due to ageing Russian&nbsp;population. Thirdly, it is necessary to make special programmes to stimulate&nbsp;business initiative of compatriots. It will help them to accommodate better and&nbsp;develop Russian regions. Also, travelling allowance must be augment especially in&nbsp;the regions of Far East.</p><p>In the end of 2009 the Ministry of &nbsp;Regional &nbsp;Development of Russia has&nbsp;developed the new project of the program which realisation will begin since 2012.&nbsp;In this document have a new positions, capable to stimulate resettlement is made.&nbsp;There will be new categories of immigrants: managers, workers, farmers, students,&nbsp;businessmen and persons, with having great achievements in science, technician or&nbsp;culture. Also possibility of participation in the program will be given compatriots&nbsp;who already are in Russia. In January, 2010 the new presidential decree was signed&nbsp;number 60, which will give the chance to become participants of the program to&nbsp;people who have arrived earlier and there live in Russia many years. &nbsp;By&nbsp;approximate estimations the number compatriots, arrived to Russia before program&nbsp;start can make to 5 million persons, some of them live till now without the Russian&nbsp;citizenship. &nbsp;This position will start to work since summer of 2010 because the&nbsp;Government of Russia should accept some documents.</p><p><strong>2. "Attraction of Educational Migrants in Russia". </strong>According to Ministry of&nbsp;Education and Science the most significant country providing Russia by&nbsp;educational migrants, is China. In 2008 in Russia studied in 15,2 thousand students&nbsp;from China, 13,5 thousand &nbsp;- &nbsp;from Kazakhstan, &nbsp;5,6 - &nbsp;from India, &nbsp;4,4 thousand &nbsp;-from Ukraine, 4,0 thousand - from Vietnam, 3,5 thousand - from Uzbekistan and&nbsp;other countries.&nbsp;</p><p>Educational migration is one of the best migratory &nbsp;flows. It has positive&nbsp;economic consequences (brings money to universities, fills up the Russian labour&nbsp;market with qualified employees) and demographic effects (many foreigners &nbsp;to&nbsp;leave &nbsp;in &nbsp;the &nbsp;country &nbsp;after &nbsp;end &nbsp;of study &nbsp;and &nbsp;fill &nbsp;up &nbsp;the &nbsp;country &nbsp;population). &nbsp;Now&nbsp;foreign students are study approximately in 600 Russians university. The majority&nbsp;of educational migrants are study in Moscow, St.-Petersburg, Novosibirsk and big&nbsp;cities.</p><p>In the Concept of Social and Economic development of Russia till 2020 (signed&nbsp;in November, 2008) as other target reference points it is registered &laquo;Increase in a&nbsp;share of the foreign students study in Russia, to 5 % of total number of students&raquo;&nbsp;(now is 2% only). &nbsp;Russia could scoop more actively migratory potential from 5among youth in CIS, and also in some developing states of Asia, Africa and Latin&nbsp;America. At the same time it is necessary to designate more accurately a priority of&nbsp;attraction of educational migrants to Russia in all demographic documents,&nbsp;including in again developed Federal &nbsp;Migratory &nbsp;Service of the Concept of&nbsp;migratory policy. It is necessary to give the chance for foreign students to obtain&nbsp;the Russian citizenship automatically.</p><p><strong>3. &nbsp;"The invitation of necessary number of &nbsp;guestworkers &nbsp;on &nbsp;Russians &nbsp;labour&nbsp;market".</strong> &nbsp;According the pessimistic predictive &nbsp;estimate &nbsp;of &nbsp;the &nbsp;Conception of&nbsp;Demographic &nbsp;Development of Russian Federation &nbsp;quantity of population above&nbsp;age 60 will exceed on 8.3 million in 2025. Also, in period between 2010-2014 the&nbsp;quantity of able-bodied citizens will decrease on 1.3 million people per year. It will&nbsp;create deficiency of a labour. Partly it will be possible to compensate reduction of a&nbsp;manpower growth of labour productivity and introduction of high technologies in&nbsp;economy. The country should involve foreign workers.</p><p>External labour migration represents the most considerable migratory flow in the&nbsp;Russian Federation. In 2008 2.4 million guestworkers worked in Russia. However,&nbsp;thus the share of foreign labour migrants among the population occupied on&nbsp;Russian labour market in 2008 remained concerning small - only 3,4%. However&nbsp;in some economy branches this share was more appreciable (for example, in&nbsp;building it has reached almost 19%). Between the official given and real scales of&nbsp;labour migration in Russia there is a considerable rupture. &nbsp;The &nbsp;quantity &nbsp;of &nbsp;not&nbsp;registered labour migrants differs from number registered several times though&nbsp;estimations of the first are rather approximate. For example, representatives of the&nbsp;Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia define number of not registered labour&nbsp;migrants in Russia around 10 million persons, and some politicians sounded figure&nbsp;15 of million migrants. More exact represent estimations to 5 million the persons,&nbsp;received by researchers. Approximately 70% of illegal labour migrants in Russiaare these citizens of the CIS countries. They have arrived legally, without the visa,&nbsp;but have not received registration or the work permit in Russia. In big cities the&nbsp;illegal markets of a labour force.</p><p>Now the foreign labour is involved to Russia more than from 140 countries.&nbsp;Three countries of the Central Asia were the largest suppliers of foreign workers in&nbsp;2008: Uzbekistan (643 thousand), Tajikistan (391 thousand), Kyrgyzstan (185&nbsp;thousand persons). From the CIS countries number of workers from Ukraine (245&nbsp;thousand), Moldova (122 thousand), Armenia (100 thousand) and Azerbaijan (76&nbsp;thousand persons) also is appreciable. &nbsp;After simplification of procedure of&nbsp;registration and work permit reception in Russia for citizens of the CIS countries&nbsp;since January, 2007, their share in total number of foreign workers has grown and&nbsp;in 2008 has made more than 73%. The third place in the list of the exports 6countries of a labour to Russia occupies China (282 thousand) and also positions of&nbsp;Turkey (131 thousand), Vietnam (95 thousand) and Democratic People's Republic&nbsp;of Korea (35 thousand persons) are powerful.</p><p>Crisis also was reflected in the migratory policy of Russia regarding regulation&nbsp;of labour migration. Attraction of a foreign labour force in the country is carried&nbsp;out within the limits of the special quotas confirmed annually by the Government&nbsp;of the Russian Federation. Then by the order of Ministry of &nbsp;Health and &nbsp;Social&nbsp;Development of a quota on delivery of work permits to foreign citizens are&nbsp;distributed between regions of Russia, and &nbsp;also &nbsp;various &nbsp;professional &nbsp;groups &nbsp;of&nbsp;migrants. Since 2007 of a quota began to be established separately for the countries&nbsp;with free-visa and a visa regime. And the size of a quota for the countries with a&nbsp;free-visa regime several times more than for the countries with visa relations.</p><p>System of quoting of foreign labor force in Russia arouses serious pretensions.For example, in 2003 and in 2007 quote was "taken from the ceiling". As a result,&nbsp;its implementation was only 40% and 20% accordingly. It mainly occurs because&nbsp;there is not clear mechanism of evaluation and methodic of accounting of real&nbsp;demand for foreign labor force, there is no balance of labor resources. On the&nbsp;strength of various conditions not all employers may make prognosis of scales of&nbsp;demand for migrants as a prospect, a part of them simply don't apply in time.</p><p>Applications &nbsp;which &nbsp;are &nbsp;collected &nbsp;in &nbsp;the &nbsp;regional &nbsp;level &nbsp;don't fix with concrete&nbsp;employers. There are often situations when application is given by one employer,&nbsp;but quote is factually &nbsp;used by another employer. &nbsp;But &nbsp;those &nbsp;who &nbsp;declare &nbsp;need &nbsp;in&nbsp;foreign workers, feels lack of quota. Such situation took place in the mid-year of&nbsp;2008, when authorities were forced to increase quote very urgently, because it had&nbsp;been exhausted in June already. As a result, instead of initially stated quote in over&nbsp;1,8 million permits, 3,4 million work permits were issued for foreign citizens in&nbsp;Russia. Thus, initial quote was exceeded almost in 2 times.</p><p>In 2009 Government of Russia fixed quote for issue of permits &nbsp;for &nbsp;foreign&nbsp;citizens in size of 4 million. But world economic crisis hardened development of&nbsp;several economic sectors, stimulated growth of unemployment and forced Russian&nbsp;authorities to revise size of quote for labor migrants. &nbsp;Also &nbsp;many &nbsp;foreign &nbsp;labor&nbsp;migrants lost the job, lost earnings in the territory of Russia. Particularly, primeminister V.V.Putin declared for double reduction of quotes for foreign labor force&nbsp;attraction into Russia in 2009. He explained reduction of quote by the impact of&nbsp;economic crisis: "At first, we should provide opportunity of employment for&nbsp;Russians, who will be over the board of their enterprises. Foreigners will be taken&nbsp;for job places which are not taken by citizens of Russia" - prime-minister claimed.&nbsp;As a result, the quota has been reduced to 2010 almost in 2 times and has made 2,6million work permits in Russia.</p><p>In the beginning of 2007 in Russia have been accepted a number of new laws&nbsp;which have been urged to correct a state of affairs in sphere of time labour&nbsp;migration. For example, registration procedure in a stay place has been simplified,&nbsp;penalties are increased by employers for use of illegal migrants. Really, now it&nbsp;became much easier to labour migrants to be registered. However, employers&nbsp;employ foreign workers spontaneously and unorganized, mainly that they can pay&nbsp;less. In the country it is required to develop a network of stock exchanges and&nbsp;private agencies on employment, to supervise working conditions of migrants.&nbsp;Also it is necessary to sign bilateral agreements with sending of labour migrants&nbsp;countries.</p><p><strong>4. &laquo;Stimulation of migratory mobility of the Russian population&raquo;.</strong> More than 6&nbsp;million unemployed among the Russian citizens &nbsp;is &nbsp;in &nbsp;Russia &nbsp;now. Migratory&nbsp;mobility of many Russians is limited because of low level of wages and a strong&nbsp;difference in the prices for habitation between different regions of the country. For&nbsp;example, many workers in Russia receive wages on which it is impossible to rent&nbsp;apartment, and, having sold own apartment in a province - will not buy flat in a big&nbsp;city where there is a possibility to get a job. It is necessary to change cardinally&nbsp;system of regulation of an internal migration, stimulating with economic methods&nbsp;of resettlement of people, to remove barriers in the form of registration &nbsp;on &nbsp;a&nbsp;residence for the Russian citizens. It should be marked that in Russia reserves of&nbsp;internal labor migration and unemployed persons are not used practically nor in&nbsp;neighboring territories, nor in my own region. The most effective use of own labor&nbsp;resources could reduce needs of Russia in foreign labor force a little. Only in 2009&nbsp;Federal Service on Labor and Employment introduced united bank of vacancies in&nbsp;the scale of all the country.</p><p>So, migration is the major resource of demographic and social and &nbsp;economic&nbsp;development of Russia. Now Russia has good chances to involve on the territory of&nbsp;migrants necessary categories. It should take advantage of this situation in interests&nbsp;of the development. Change of the Russian migratory policy in the specified&nbsp;directions can benefit the state and a society.</p><br />]]></description>
            <author>人文与社会</author>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:23:47 +1600</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
